
01-04-2004, 11:01 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 52
|
|
Quote:
|
it would not matter how fast the second motor was because it is not using electricity to drive it it is using the other motor. the only thing that would limit it would be friction.
|
do you understand what he's trying to do at all? He's using the first motor as a GENERATOR (GENERATES ELECTRICITY) and he wants to use that electricity to run the second motor. And it would hardly create any electricity, so the second motor would be providing about 20% (at the very most) of the power that the first motor is making, which means that the first motor is gonna have to fight against the second motor to run at any decent speed
|

01-04-2004, 11:04 PM
|
 |
X-mod Innovator
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 82
|
|
|
no no no the second motor is generating additional energy for the fist like a boost
so technically you would gain 20% power form the turbo
__________________
---------------------------------
++ Project X-mod 2006 ++
---------------------------------
X-mod EVO with CVT tranny!
|

01-04-2004, 11:09 PM
|
|
|
|
personally ied just pop another batter in there saving weight an there would be no where else for the motor to lose power by pushin another motor
|

01-04-2004, 11:33 PM
|
 |
X-mod Innovator
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 82
|
|
|
the loss wopuldn't be noticed only the gain would be noticed and not only is the gain it applied when and where u want it most at high rpms and after the pcb so the additional power isn't restricted by passing throught the pcb to get to the motor. think bout it... it just makes sense
__________________
---------------------------------
++ Project X-mod 2006 ++
---------------------------------
X-mod EVO with CVT tranny!
|

01-05-2004, 01:25 AM
|
 |
Li-Ion Addict
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 60
|
|
Well, no, it doesn't make sense at all. No offense
You're talking about gaining more from the generator than you lose to generate the electricity. It's a lovely idea, but just like the perpetual motion machine, it's quite impossible. If it were possible, we'd have electric motors all over the place with no power sources generating all the electricity in the world! Who needs oil!?!?
If you really want a "turbo" mod, why not just hook 2 motors to the drive train? You wouldn't need any additional voltage if you wire the motors in parallel (voltage drops across parallel circuits are the same). Of course your current draw would be much increased, which might be an issue for the stock speed controller on the PCB, and possibly an issue with max current draw from the batteries (approximately double normal current draw). In any case, your battery life would be half what it normally is, even if it could handle the extra draw.
As a side note, when will people learn that a turbo is an exhaust-gas driven supercharger; a forced induction device that pushes more AIR into an engine. The key word here is AIR, not electricity.
__________________
pbmax
|

01-05-2004, 01:51 AM
|
 |
RC Tinkerer
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 193
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bleek
no no no the second motor is generating additional energy for the fist like a boost
so technically you would gain 20% power form the turbo
|
Where do you get this 20% figure?
How would you keep the motor from using electricity?
I think you need to read this thread, this has been discussed already, and it will not work.
A wonderful idea, an alternator
|

01-05-2004, 09:22 AM
|
 |
I'm not a pyro, really.
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Little Falls, NY
Posts: 1,117
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Bleek
some of you aren't understanding the concept. the second motor is running off the power driving the car so there is no loss in energy only a gain. it might not be as much as desired but u will notice it as the rpms increase and more evergy is generated. but i want to talk to some of u on ain for a thorough explaination
|
to make it work you'll need to put some diodes between the "generator" and the motor driving the motor so that the second motor isnt driving too.
Quote:
|
As a side note, when will people learn that a turbo is an exhaust-gas driven supercharger; a forced induction device that pushes more AIR into an engine. The key word here is AIR, not electricity.
|
and its only supposed to give the effect of a turbo. Effect is the key word here
__________________
Yellow Skyline X-MOD: AWD, Ball bearings, 4.5 tie rod & Stock springs, Stage 2 Road Race Motor, 6 Cell Mod
Silver RSX XMOD: Stock, Stage 2 Drift Motor
NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER
OF STUPID PEOPLE IN LARGE NUMBERS!
|

01-05-2004, 11:35 AM
|
 |
RC Tinkerer
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cyberspace
Posts: 193
|
|
|
It still would NOT work. The drive motor would have more drag on it than the "Generator" would generate energy. Look at the other forum I listed above. ALL this was ALREADY discussed, and all the scuienrific explinations were already listed there.
|

01-05-2004, 02:16 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 52
|
|
|
The next one of these argument topics:
"hi u guys where can I get some plutonium so i can put a radioisotope thermal generator in my xmod? i don't feel like spending the money on i-c3's. thx"
|

01-05-2004, 03:16 PM
|
 |
X-mod Innovator
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 82
|
|
|
yeah the effect is the only simularity besides the gain. having it run off back presure on x-mods through exhaust is nearly impossible, stating that nothing is impossible. but i think it is possible with very little resistance and a low torque second motor generator.i am working on a working model right now and i am almost done. if and when it's completed i will try to put a movie on to show everyone.
__________________
---------------------------------
++ Project X-mod 2006 ++
---------------------------------
X-mod EVO with CVT tranny!
|

01-05-2004, 06:25 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 52
|
|
|
xmods don't have exhaust sparky, they have electric motors
and how exactly do you plan on making this miniature 'low torque second motor generator'?
|

01-05-2004, 06:33 PM
|
 |
X-mod Innovator
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 82
|
|
|
very carefully........
__________________
---------------------------------
++ Project X-mod 2006 ++
---------------------------------
X-mod EVO with CVT tranny!
|

01-07-2004, 06:56 PM
|
|
TinyRC Pro
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mississippi USA
Posts: 34
|
|
|
one th turbo it will work you need a better understanding of electronics
ok what yall are talking about confused me for a min but then i cought on to what you wanted to do but for me to explain what would be need ed to do this it would be easier to make a video and sho all of you see the problem comes in when you connect the other motor to the main motor well one the turbo would have to generate more voltage at the same rpm than the one driving the car, Two if you connect the two positives and the two negatives you going to have both motors driving and you will get the same power out put that if you had one motor THREE If you wanna do it right the firs t ime your gonna need some thing called a diode and all the specs for this to stop the voltace from going to the other turbo motor and driving it a diode actually is a one way valve it allows electricity to go one way but not the other so you need 2 diodes to stop the electricity to the second motor that is the only way i can think of doing this it is a good idea and i am gonna try it i will produce more specific details on it and all the part numbers on what you will need to do it and i will tell you if it is worth it and if you don't think i know what i am talking about i had 2 years of electronics and i graduated top of my class i will produce more specific details
__________________
Nissan Racing
KA24E
7500 RPM
280 HP
270FT-lbs
|

01-07-2004, 09:00 PM
|
|
I Shall Return!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 203
|
|
|
well im no pro and my electronic expertise in no way even comes close to NissanGTR01 but i am a good thinker, a turbo is a fantastic idea, but with two motors its tricky, a simpler and lighter way would be to install two extra batteries in series (6th cell mod) then using diodes and timed resistors and a bunch of other components (electronic nub)... and possibly some how get the car to run on 4 cells and then after say 5 seconds of full throttle the voltage would increase gradually,(so at first youd have a resisted 4.8V and after 5 seconds of blasting it, the resistors would gradually let off giving you 7.2V) raising voltage,and thus raising speed. you could then swap the timing resisitors to any time or buildup rate you wish, from like 0 seconds which is usesful for tire spinning drifiting, to a say 5 seconds for the best traction... this is just my imput, and i was hoping some of you experts could tell me what you think
im also aware that this can be acomplished by gradually increasing the throttle but this way sounds funner, and also the low to high ( simulated nitrous) button sounds promising..
|

01-07-2004, 09:06 PM
|
|
I really should change my title...
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 109
|
|
|
how about having 6 cell and 2 motors? or is that too much.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 AM.
|
|