potentiality
02-11-2004, 07:23 AM
Have you all seen that there is room in the rear pod to switch the motor and diff to make a mid mounted motor (better handling. turning). The three things that would have to be overcome are this:
A: The chassis and upper brace would have to be about a 7/16" (havent really verified this yet) shorter. You could use some epoxy and some fiberglass strips to reattach. It still wouldn't be perfect, unless you bought a sheet of carbon fiber and cut one out yourself.
B: The rear pods halves would have to be drilled with a 2mm drillbit on the direct opposite sided of the pods to hold the rear spring. As far as holding in the bearings/bushings since now they would be to the "inside". Anything to 3mm orings, to a 3mm shaft that you put on as you install the diff through the pods would work.
You could also redrill the spring retainer on the main chassis to the middle of the upperbrace, and keep the stock brace "flipped" around on the rear pod. If you went this way though, you would
not leave any room for placing electronics on the brace.
You could avoid all of the above by running the motor and diff reversed. But if the motor is timed, you are ruining your speed, since you would have decreased the timing by those degrees in forward. (Unless you popped the endbell and rotated it 180 degrees). This would be the simplest solution, but then you couldnt switch motors with friends easily.
C: To allow for 6 cell AA packs, the servo would have to be mounted to the front of the chassis, and the body posts redrilled about 1/4" out further on the front support.
You'd flip the whole steering assembly around, and notch the upper chassis where the servo arm contacts so it could still rotate under it.
You might have to get bodies with more "bulky" front ends though, because ones with too much slope (like a GT) could possible not fit if the rear of the servo sticks too far forward. So Sedan types should work fine. You'd also definetly want to give yourself a front foam bumber since a head on collision would end up hitting the servo.
Of course the stock electronics holder would no longer work, so you would have to take them out of the covering, shrink wrap them, and place where your could with servo tape.
What do you all think? Am I on to something? I dont have any fiberglass sheets nor equipment to try this on sitting around.
Would it be worth the trouble? I really think so if your a driver. Better steering, and quicker response. Plus more even tire wear between the front and rear since the weight transfer would be shifted.
A: The chassis and upper brace would have to be about a 7/16" (havent really verified this yet) shorter. You could use some epoxy and some fiberglass strips to reattach. It still wouldn't be perfect, unless you bought a sheet of carbon fiber and cut one out yourself.
B: The rear pods halves would have to be drilled with a 2mm drillbit on the direct opposite sided of the pods to hold the rear spring. As far as holding in the bearings/bushings since now they would be to the "inside". Anything to 3mm orings, to a 3mm shaft that you put on as you install the diff through the pods would work.
You could also redrill the spring retainer on the main chassis to the middle of the upperbrace, and keep the stock brace "flipped" around on the rear pod. If you went this way though, you would
not leave any room for placing electronics on the brace.
You could avoid all of the above by running the motor and diff reversed. But if the motor is timed, you are ruining your speed, since you would have decreased the timing by those degrees in forward. (Unless you popped the endbell and rotated it 180 degrees). This would be the simplest solution, but then you couldnt switch motors with friends easily.
C: To allow for 6 cell AA packs, the servo would have to be mounted to the front of the chassis, and the body posts redrilled about 1/4" out further on the front support.
You'd flip the whole steering assembly around, and notch the upper chassis where the servo arm contacts so it could still rotate under it.
You might have to get bodies with more "bulky" front ends though, because ones with too much slope (like a GT) could possible not fit if the rear of the servo sticks too far forward. So Sedan types should work fine. You'd also definetly want to give yourself a front foam bumber since a head on collision would end up hitting the servo.
Of course the stock electronics holder would no longer work, so you would have to take them out of the covering, shrink wrap them, and place where your could with servo tape.
What do you all think? Am I on to something? I dont have any fiberglass sheets nor equipment to try this on sitting around.
Would it be worth the trouble? I really think so if your a driver. Better steering, and quicker response. Plus more even tire wear between the front and rear since the weight transfer would be shifted.